References

Agre, Philip E 1997. Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI. In Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, 131–57. New York, London: Psychology Press.

Agre, Philip E 1998. Introduction. In Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by Philip E. Agre and Marc Rotenberg, 1–28. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Agre, Philip E. 1998. Beyond the Mirror World: Privacy and the Representational Practices of Computing. In Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by Philip E. Agre and Marc Rotenberg, 29–61. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Agre, Philip E., and Marc Rotenberg, eds 1998. Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Bender, Emily M., Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell 2021. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–23. Virtual Event Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922.

Bijker, Wiebe E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Inside Technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas Parke Hughes, and Trevor J. Pinch, eds. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.

Boden, Margaret A., and Ernest A. Edmonds 2009. What Is Generative Art? Digital Creativity 20 (1–2): 21–46. doi:10.1080/14626260902867915.

Born, Rainer, ed. 1987. Artificial Intelligence: The Case Against. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Born, Rainer, ed. 2018. Artificial Intelligence: The Case Against. New York: Routledge.

Born, Rainer, and Ilse Born-Lechleitner 1987. Introduction. In Artificial Intelligence: The Case Against, edited by Rainer Born, i–xxxv. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Brown, Tom B., Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, et al. 2020. Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. ArXiv:2005.14165 [Cs], July. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165.

Bryson, Joanna J. 2010. Robots Should Be Slaves. In Natural Language Processing, edited by Yorick Wilks, 8:63–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry.

Bryson, Joanna J., and Philip P. Kime 2011. Just an Artifact: Why Machines Are Perceived as Moral Agents. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume Two, 1641–46. IJCAI’11. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain: AAAI Press. doi:10.5555/2283516.2283669.

Buolamwini, Gebru and Raji Win AI Innovation Award for Research into Biometric Bias | Biometric Update. n.d. Accessed January 25, 2023. https://www.biometricupdate.com/201907/buolamwini-gebru-and-raji-win-ai-innovation-award-for-research-into-biometric-bias.

Bur, Tatiana 2016. Mechanical Miracles: Automata in Ancient Greek Religion. Master’s Thesis, University of Sydney. https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/15398.

Cave, Stephen, and Kanta Dihal 2020. The Whiteness of AI. Philosophy & Technology 33 (4): 685–703. doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00415-6.

Cave, Stephen; Craig, Claire; Dihal, Kanta; Dillon, Sarah; Montgomery, Jessica; Singler, Beth; Taylor, Lindsay 2018. Portrayals and Perceptions of AI and Why They Matter. London: The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/ai-narratives/AI-narratives-workshop-findings.pdf.

Cave, Stephen; Dihal, Kanta; Dillon, Sarah (eds.) 2020. AI Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chandler, Daniel 2017. Semiotics: The Basics. Abingdon Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Chesterman, Simon 2021. We, the Robots? Regulating Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of the Law. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Cobley, Paul, ed. 2010. The Routledge Companion to Semiotics. Routledge Companions. London; New York: Routledge.

Dale, Robert 2021. GPT-3: What’s It Good for? Natural Language Engineering 27 (1): 113–18. doi:10.1017/S1351324920000601.

Davison, Joe 2018. No, Machine Learning Is Not Just Glorified Statistics. Medium (blog). June 27, 2018. https://towardsdatascience.com/no-machine-learning-is-not-just-glorified-statistics-26d3952234e3.

Visser, Ewart J. de, Samuel S. Monfort, Ryan McKendrick, Melissa A. B. Smith, Patrick E. McKnight, Frank Krueger, and Raja Parasuraman 2016. Almost Human: Anthropomorphism Increases Trust Resilience in Cognitive Agents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 22 (3): 331–49. doi:10.1037/xap0000092.

Waal, Frans B. M. de 1999. Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial: Consistency in Our Thinking about Humans and Other Animals. Philosophical Topics 27 (1): 255–80. doi:10.5840/philtopics199927122.

DoD 2012. Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Department of Defense Directive Number 3000.09. United States. Department of Defense. https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=726163.

Elkins, Katherine, and Jon Chun 2020. Can GPT-3 Pass a Writer’s Turing Test. Journal of Cultural Analytics 2371:1–16.

Fragaki, Hélène 2012. Automates et statues merveilleuses dans l’Alexandrie antique. Journal des Savants 1 (1): 29–67. doi:10.3406/jds.2012.6293.

Gardner, Nikolas 2021. Clausewitzian Friction and Autonomous Weapon Systems. Comparative Strategy 40 (1): 86–98. doi:10.1080/01495933.2021.1853442.

Gell, Alfred 1992. The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology. In Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics, by Jeremy Coote and Anthony Shelton, 40–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Geraci, Robert M. 2008. Apocalyptic AI: Religion and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (1): 138–66. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfm101.

Glickman, Moshe, and Tali Sharot 2022. Biased AI Systems Produce Biased Humans. OSF Preprints. doi:10.31219/osf.io/c4e7r.

Goddard, Kate, Abdul Roudsari, and Jeremy C Wyatt 2012. Automation Bias: A Systematic Review of Frequency, Effect Mediators, and Mitigators. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 19 (1): 121–27. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089.

Goodman, C. P. 2003. The Tacit Dimension. Polanyiana 2 (1): 133–57.

GPT-3 2020. A Robot Wrote This Entire Article. Are You Scared yet, Human? The Guardian, September 8, 2020. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3.

Gray, Chris Hables 1997. Artificial Intelligence at War: An Analysis of the Aegis System in Combat. In Reinventing Technology, Rediscovering Community: Critical Explorations of Computing as a Social Practice, edited by Philip E. Agre and Douglas Schuler, 127–42. London: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Greene, Tristan 2022. DeepMind’s New Gato AI Makes Me Fear Humans Will Never Achieve AGI. TNW | Neural. May 13, 2022. https://thenextweb.com/news/deepminds-astounding-new-gato-ai-makes-fear-humans-will-never-achieve-agi.

Harbers, Maaike, Marieke M. M. Peeters, and Mark A. Neerincx 2017. Perceived Autonomy of Robots: Effects of Appearance and Context. In A World with Robots: International Conference on Robot Ethics: ICRE 2015, edited by Maria Isabel Aldinhas Ferreira, Joao Silva Sequeira, Mohammad Osman Tokhi, Endre E. Kadar, and Gurvinder Singh Virk, 19–33. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_2.

Horowitz, Michael C., Lauren Kahn, Julia Macdonald, and Jacquelyn Schneider 2022. COVID-19 and Public Support for Autonomous Technologies—Did the Pandemic Catalyze a World of Robots? PLOS ONE 17 (9): e0273941. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273941.

Irvine, Martin 2022. Semiotics in Computing and Information Systems. In Bloomsbury Semiotics. Volume 2: Semiotics in the Natural and Technical Sciences, edited by Jamin Pelkey and Stéphanie Walsh Matthews, 2:203–37. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Johansen, Sigrid Redse 2018. So Man Created Robot in His Own Image: The Anthropomorphism of Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict. Oslo Law Review 5 (2): 89–102. doi:10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2018-02-03.

Johnson, James 2022. Delegating Strategic Decision-Making to Machines: Dr. Strangelove Redux? Journal of Strategic Studies 45 (3): 439–77. doi:10.1080/01402390.2020.1759038.

Johnson, Deborah G., and Mario Verdicchio 2017. Reframing AI Discourse. Minds and Machines 27 (4): 575–90. doi:10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6.

Julyk, David P. 2008. ‘The Trouble With Machines Is People.’ The Computer as Icon in Post-War America: 1946-1970. Doctoral thesis, University of Michigan.

Kang, Minsoo 2011. Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Katz, Yarden 2020. Artificial Whiteness: Politics and Ideology in Artificial Intelligence. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kennedy, John S. 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kline, Ronald 2010. Cybernetics, Automata Studies, and the Dartmouth Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 33 (4): 5–16. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2010.44.

Korngiebel, Diane M., and Sean D. Mooney 2021. Considering the Possibilities and Pitfalls of Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) in Healthcare Delivery. Npj Digital Medicine 4 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00464-x.

Krishnan, Armin 2016. Killer Robots: Legality and Ethicality of Autonomous Weapons. London, England; New York, New York: Routledge.

Leveson, Nancy G. 2017. The Therac-25: 30 Years Later. Computer 50 (11): 8–11. doi:10.1109/MC.2017.4041349.

Leveson, Nancy G., and C.S. Turner 1993. An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents. Computer 26 (7): 18–41. doi:10.1109/MC.1993.274940.

Lovelace, Douglas C., ed. 2016. Autonomous and Semiautonomous Weapons Systems. Vol. 144. Terrorism: Commentary on Security Documents. New York: Oxford University Press.

Martin, C. Dianne 1993. The Myth of the Awesome Thinking Machine. Communications of the ACM 36 (4): 120–33. doi:10.1145/255950.153587.

Mayor, Adrienne 2018. Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

McCarthy, John, Marvin L. Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude E. Shannon 1955. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. http://raysolomonoff.com/dartmouth/boxa/dart564props.pdf.

McCarthy, John, Marvin L. Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude E. Shannon 2006. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine 27 (4): 12–14.

McCauley, Lee 2007. Countering the Frankenstein Complex. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics, 42–44.

McGuffie, Kris, and Alex Newhouse 2020. The Radicalization Risks of GPT-3 and Advanced Neural Language Models. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2009.06807.

Meunier, Jean-Guy 1989. Artificial Intelligence and Sign Theory. Semiotica 77 (1–3): 43–64. doi:10.1515/semi.1989.77.1-3.43.

Mosco, Vincent 2004. The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Nast, Condé. n.d. How China Could Beat the West in the Deadly Race for AI Weapons. Wired UK. Accessed May 1, 2023. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/artificial-intelligence-weapons-warfare-project-maven-google-china.

Natale, Simone, and Andrea Ballatore 2020. Imagining the Thinking Machine: Technological Myths and the Rise of Artificial Intelligence. Convergence 26 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1177/1354856517715164.

Payne, Kenneth 2021. I, Warbot: The Dawn of Artificially Intelligent Conflict. London: Hurst & Company.

Penn, Jonathan 2021. Inventing Intelligence: On the History of Complex Information Processing and Artificial Intelligence in the United States in the Mid-Twentieth Century. Thesis, University of Cambridge. doi:10.17863/CAM.63087.

Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker 1984. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441. doi:10.1177/030631284014003004.

Polanyi, Michael 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.

Polanyi, Michael, and Amartya Sen 2009. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

Raji, Inioluwa Deborah, I. Elizabeth Kumar, Aaron Horowitz, and Andrew Selbst 2022. The Fallacy of AI Functionality. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 959–72. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3531146.3533158.

Roberts, John Michael, and Colin Cremin 2017. Contested Meanings, Myths and Hyperimages of the Apocalypse: The Bakhtin Circle and the Politicisation of Catastrophism. Social Semiotics 27 (2): 178–94. doi:10.1080/10350330.2016.1182303.

Salvatore, Sergio, Jaan Valsiner, and Giuseppe Alessandro Veltri 2019. The Theoretical and Methodological Framework. Semiotic Cultural Psychology, Symbolic Universes and Lines of Semiotic Forces. In Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post) Crisis, 25–49. Springer.

Sayler, Kelley M. 2021. Defense Primer: U.S. Policy on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems. CRS In Focus, IF11150. Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=861619.

Scharre, Paul 2018. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. New York; London: W. W. Norton & Company.

Scharre, Paul, and Michael Horowitz 2015. An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Project on Ethical Autonomy. Center for a New American Security. http://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/188865/Ethical%20Autonomy%20Working%20Paper_021015_v02.pdf.

Shane, Janelle 2019. You Look like a Thing and I Love You: How Artificial Intelligence Works and Why It’s Making the World a Weirder Place. New York: Voracious/Little, Brown and Company.

Sharkey, Noel E. 2012. The Evitability of Autonomous Robot Warfare. International Review of the Red Cross 94 (886): 787–800. doi:10.1017/S1816383112000732.

Sharkey, Noel 2014. Killing Made Easy: From Joysticks to Politics. In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, 111–28. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6733961.

Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel Sharkey 2021. Sunlight Glinting on Clouds: Deception and Autonomous Weapons Systems. In Counter-Terrorism, Ethics and Technology, 35–47. Cham: Springer.

Sharkey, Amanda, and Noel Sharkey 2021. We Need to Talk about Deception in Social Robotics! Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3): 309–16. doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9.

Singler, Beth 2020. The AI Creation Meme: A Case Study of the New Visibility of Religion in Artificial Intelligence Discourse. Religions 11 (5): 253. doi:10.3390/rel11050253.

Singler, Beth 2020. ‘Blessed by the Algorithm’: Theistic Conceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Online Discourse. AI & SOCIETY 35 (4): 945–55. doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00968-2.

Sismondo, Sergio 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Smith, Gary 2018. The AI Delusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stahl, Bernd Carsten, Tonii Leach, Oluyinka Oyeniji, and George Ogoh 2023. AI Policy as a Response to AI Ethics? Addressing Ethical Issues in the Development of AI Policies in North Africa. In Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, edited by Damian Okaibedi Eke, Kutoma Wakunuma, and Simisola Akintoye, 141–67. Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_7.

Taylor, Trevor 2019. Artificial Intelligence in Defence. The RUSI Journal 164 (5–6): 72–81. doi:10.1080/03071847.2019.1694229.

Tiku, Nitasha 2021. Google Fired Its Star AI Researcher One Year Ago. Now She’s Launching Her Own Institute. Washington Post, December 2, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/12/02/timnit-gebru-dair/.

Tresch, John 2011. The Machine Awakens: The Science and Politics of the Fantastic Automaton. French Historical Studies 34 (1): 87–123. doi:10.1215/00161071-2010-024.

Truitt, Elly Rachel 2004. ‘Trei Poete, Sages Dotors, Qui Mout Sorent Di Nigromance’: Knowledge and Automata in Twelfth-Century French Literature. Configurations 12 (2): 167–93. doi:10.1353/con.2006.0006.

Truitt, Elly Rachel 2015. Medieval Robots. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Uexküll, Jakob von 1992. A Stroll through the Worlds of Animals and Men: A Picture Book of Invisible Worlds 89 (4): 319–91. doi:10.1515/semi.1992.89.4.319.

Uexküll, Jakob von 2001. The New Concept of Umwelt: A Link between Science and the Humanities. Semiotica 2001 (134). doi:10.1515/semi.2001.018.

Vannuccini, Simone; Prytkova, Ekaterina 2020. Artificial Intelligence’s New Clothes? From General Purpose Technology to Large Technical System. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3704011. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3704011.

Viidalepp, Auli 2020. Representations of Robots in Science Fiction Film Narratives as Signifiers of Human Identity. Információs Társadalom 20 (4): 19–36. doi:10.22503/inftars.XX.2020.4.2.

Viidalepp, Auli 2022. Sociocommunicative Functions of a Generative Text: The Case of GPT-3. Lexia. Rivista Di Semiotica 39–40:177–92. doi:10.53136/979122180426310.

Winner, Langdon 1978. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. 9. printing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Pr.

Zhai, Yujia; Yan, Jiaqi; Zhang, Hezhao; Lu, Wei 2020. Tracing the Evolution of AI: Conceptualization of Artificial Intelligence in Mass Media Discourse. Information Discovery and Delivery 48 (3): 137–49. doi:10.1108/IDD-01-2020-0007.